Our office has moved to St. Paul in the Midway area. Our new address is:
2356 University Ave. West #230
St. Paul, MN 55114
We are keeping our same phone number (952-915-9215). Give us a call to schedule an appointment!
Welcome to the exciting world of ERISA! This blog is written by attorneys Kate MacKinnon and Sarah Demers at the Law Office of Katherine L. MacKinnon. Here, we'll talk about ERISA: updates on employee benefit law, information we hope people who have been denied benefits will find helpful, and any news or tidbits we think should be shared with the world.
Search This Blog
Tuesday, December 29, 2015
Wednesday, December 2, 2015
Life insurance beneficiary forms - common mistakes
Filling out the beneficiary form for your life insurance can be more tricky than you think. There are several common mistakes, including:
The problems caused by a mistake on a beneficiary form will not impact you, but will greatly impact those you love.
Check out more tips in this article.
We advise both insureds and beneficiaries who have questions or problems with life insurance. Contact our office if you would like more information.
- Naming a minor child without designating how the money should be distributed. Money cannot be given directly to a minor child. It needs to be placed in a trust account or special account for minors such as an UTMA or UGMA account.
- Forgetting to update the beneficiary form. An insurance policy is a contract, and the money will generally be distributed how your beneficiary form says it should be done. If you have your wife as your beneficiary, and get divorced but forget to change the beneficiary designation, usually the proceeds will go to your ex-wife.
- Only naming one beneficiary. If you only name one beneficiary, and that person predeceases you, there will be no beneficiary. Make sure to name at least one secondary beneficiary.
The problems caused by a mistake on a beneficiary form will not impact you, but will greatly impact those you love.
Check out more tips in this article.
We advise both insureds and beneficiaries who have questions or problems with life insurance. Contact our office if you would like more information.
Friday, November 13, 2015
Star Tribune Article on Disabled Adults
As attorneys who represent persons with varying disabilities, a recent article in the Star Tribune discussing the menial jobs given to people with disabilities was heartbreaking. The article talks about "sheltered workshops", where workers are paid wages for below the minimum wage and given tasks that are menial and unrewarding.
Full article: click here
Hopefully the attention given to this issue will inspire some changes in how Minnesota views its responsibilities to the disabled adult residents of our state.
"Many states, inspired by a new civil rights
movement to integrate the disabled into mainstream life, are shuttering
places like this. Not Minnesota. It still subsidizes nearly 300
sheltered workshops and is now among the most segregated states in the
nation for working people with intellectual disabilities.
The workshops are part of a larger patchwork
of state policies that are stranding legions of disabled Minnesotans on
grim margins of society. More than a decade after the U.S. Supreme
Court ruled that Americans with disabilities have a right to live in the
mainstream, many disabled Minnesotans and their families say they still
feel forsaken — mired in profoundly isolating and sometimes dangerous
environments they didn’t choose and can’t escape."
Full article: click here
Hopefully the attention given to this issue will inspire some changes in how Minnesota views its responsibilities to the disabled adult residents of our state.
Thursday, September 3, 2015
Kate talks Obergefell and same-sex marriage
Kate recently had the opportunity to speak at Minnesota CLE about the recent decision in Obergefell v. Hodges, 576 U.S. ___, 135 S. Ct. 2584, 192 L.Ed. 2d
609 (6/26/15).
In the ground-breaking decision, Justice Anthony Kennedy, writing for the Court’s majority, held that the Due Process and Equal Protection Clauses afford same-sex couples the fundamental right to marry in all states. Additionally, the Supreme Court majority held that the same constitutional protections require a state to recognize a same-sex marriage lawfully licensed by and performed in another state.
Kate discussed the reasoning behind the decision and its implications on other areas of law such as employee benefits and religious expression.
You can see the telecast of the live CLE on September 3, 2015. For more information go to: Minnesota CLE video replay
In the ground-breaking decision, Justice Anthony Kennedy, writing for the Court’s majority, held that the Due Process and Equal Protection Clauses afford same-sex couples the fundamental right to marry in all states. Additionally, the Supreme Court majority held that the same constitutional protections require a state to recognize a same-sex marriage lawfully licensed by and performed in another state.
Kate discussed the reasoning behind the decision and its implications on other areas of law such as employee benefits and religious expression.
You can see the telecast of the live CLE on September 3, 2015. For more information go to: Minnesota CLE video replay
Thursday, August 27, 2015
ERISA is a current hot topic in the federal courts!
There has been a considerable amount of interest recently in ERISA at all levels of the federal courts. Having a lawyer who understands and can navigate this complicated and changing area is critical to whether your case will be successful.
This article discusses why a business should hire experienced ERISA lawyers:
This article discusses why a business should hire experienced ERISA lawyers:
Top 10 reasons to have an ERISA litigator on speed dial
Although we represent claimants, the reasons behind hiring a lawyer who understands ERISA are still on point. It is exciting to hear that ERISA is such a hot topic!
Thursday, June 4, 2015
Kate and Sarah are North Star Lawyers!
Kate and Sarah were recognized as North Star Lawyers for providing pro bono service to those in need of legal service but unable to afford it. Here we are holding the announcement in the Star Tribune:
Thursday, May 28, 2015
FAQ: When should I get an attorney involved in my disability/life insurance/pension issue?
There
are three common times when you should think about involving an attorney in your ERISA
employee benefits dispute or claim: (1) when submitting an application for
benefits, (2) after the denial of benefits, and (3) at the commencement of
litigation. Here is why you might choose to retain an attorney at any one of
these times.
You
might decide to hire an attorney to submit your application or claim for
benefits. This is a good strategy if you have a complicated situation or issue
that may affect your application. One example might be if you are applying for long-term
disability benefits after being terminated from employment or quitting from
your job. Another example might be if your disabling condition is complicated
your application for disability benefits may require some explanation as to why
you can no longer perform you job. Applications are time consuming and
complicated, so sometimes people hire an attorney to handle the application
because he or she does not have the time or energy to devote to making sure the
insurer receives all the information necessary. As long as your benefit plan is
governed by ERISA, you will be allowed a chance to appeal any decision made by
the plan administrator that is adverse to you, so many claimants choose to
apply for benefits on their own and then hire an attorney only if they are
denied.
The
most common time individuals hire an attorney is after he or she has had a pension,
life insurance, or disability benefit denied. The attorney can then submit an
administrative appeal for the claimant. An administrative appeal is a written
appeal to the plan administrator explaining why the decision to deny benefits
was wrong, and submitting any new evidence in support of the claim. An
administrative appeal is VERY important, because once it is submitted you are frequently
no longer allowed to submit any new evidence to support your claim to the
insurer. Generally, it is best to consult an attorney when submitting your
administrative appeal, so you can be sure the evidence in the administrative
record (everything submitted to the plan administrator by you, and everything
the plan administrator gathers or creates on its own in regards to your claim)
is as complete as possible so the insurer can make a full and fair review of
your claim for benefits.
Once
you have completed all your administrative appeals, the only option to pursue
your case further is usually to bring a lawsuit in federal court. At this
phase, you should almost always hire an attorney to represent you in your case.
ERISA cases have complex legal issues like how much deference should be given
to the insurer’s decision. It is best to have good legal representation once
litigation begins.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)